A Closer Look at Avascular Necrosis of the Hip
November 16, 2017
2 min. read
Avascular necrosis accounts for approximately 10% of all total hip arthroplasties performed in the United States. Avascular necrosis can be caused when decreased blood flow is caused at the femoral head, which then leads to cellular death, fracture, and eventual collapse of the articular surface. Ultimately, of individuals who are diagnosed with AVN, there is a collapse rate of 67% in asymptomatic and 85% in symptomatic patients.1,2
Who is at Risk?
Moyer-Angeler and colleagues performed a review of the indirect and direct risk factors for the eventual development of AVN and found the following results:1
Direct Risk Factors | Indirect Risk Factors |
---|---|
Femoral Head/Neck Fracture | Chronic Corticosteroid Use |
Hip Dislocation | Excessive Smoking and/or Alcohol Use |
Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis | Coagulation Disorders |
Radiation Therapy | Hemoglobinopathies |
Sickle Cell Disease | Dysbaric Phenomena |
Caisson Disease | Autoimmune Diseases |
Myeloproliferative Disorders | Hyperlipidemia |
What is the Clinical Presentation?
Clinical presentation may include subjective complaints likeasymptomatic pain in early stages, and groin pain radiating to the knee or ipsilateral buttock. X-ray imaging may be negative in early stages as well.1,3,4
The physical examination may reveal painful, global restrictions in active and/or passive range of motion (especially internal rotation). Bilateral symptoms are also common, and are reported in 70% of cases. The patient may also present with an antalgic gait pattern.
Symptoms may be distributed as follows:
Hip Region (97%)
Groin (93%)
Buttock (34%)
Greater Trochanter (9%)
Referred Pain (77%)
Knee (68%)
Anterior Thigh (36%)
Lower Leg (18%)
Low Back (8%)
Pain from AVNis significantly more frequent in the knee and lower leg, but significantly less frequent in the lower back than pain from osteoarthritis.1,3,4
What About Special Testing?
The tables below show theaccuracy of various diagnostic tests:7
Hip Extension < 15 Degrees | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Reliability | Sensitivity | Specificity | +LR | -LR |
N/A | 0.19 | 0.92 | 2.38 | .88 |
Hip External Rotation < 60 Degrees | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Reliability | Sensitivity | Specificity | +LR | -LR |
N/A | .38 | .73 | .48 | .85 |
Pain with Internal Rotation | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Reliability | Sensitivity | Specificity | +LR | -LR |
N/A | 0.13 | 0.86 | 0.93 | 1.01 |
Is Conservative Management Effective?
Unfortunately, based on the few studies available evaluating the effectiveness of conservative and physical therapy intervention, there is no evidence supporting the ability of these interventions to decrease symptoms or prevent disease progression.5,6 At present, the best options available for this patient population involves either total hip arthroplasty(see the video animation below)or core decompression. Having the ability to rule out/in this disorder is of utmost importance in order for the appropriate surgical intervention to be applied.
Below, watch Haideh Plock introduce an animated walkthrough of total hip replacement surgery in a short clip from her course, Post Surgical Management Part 3: Lower Extremity Surgical Interventions.